No 'Net Neutrality' Laws Needed, Panel Says|
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- When it comes to Net Neutrality, does the government know best?
Emphatically no, according to a consensus of telecom professionals and lobbyists assembled Wednesday in downtown Washington. Among industry players, concern is mounting over exactly what the FCC meant when, last month, it issued four basic principles that it claims will preserve the open and interconnected nature of the net.
Could such principles -- called by some proponents as a way to guarantee Internet freedom -- actually stifle innovation and result in fewer choices for consumers? Perhaps even more distressing for the large incumbents in telecom and cable industries -- do they indicate growing government assertiveness in the regulation of broadband?
These issues were batted back and forth at “Net Neutrality or Net Neutering in a Post-Brand X World,” an event sponsored by the D.C.-based Progress & Freedom Foundation (PFF). Most of the seven-person panel expressed little faith in the federal government to effectively regulate high-speed Internet access, while encouraging robust competition, maximum innovation and effective investment as an alternative to codified “freedoms.”
“We know from past experience that government regulations impose significant costs on businesses and consumers,” said Tom Tauke, executive vice president for public affairs for Verizon. “We know from past experience -- the 1996 Telecom Act, for example -- that government rules have unintended consequences. Some of these consequences may not emerge for years after the regulations take effect, and may very well hamper deployment of the very technologies that we should be encouraging.”
In August, the FCC issued its four principles to explain its position on net access and neutrality, a position many saw as somewhat weakened by caveats that were missing from the original “freedoms” plan as outlined by former FCC chairman Michael Powell. However, since their release, these precepts have generated more confusion than clarification. For the time being, forum participants agreed, companies and consumers should adopt a cautious approach, watching closely to see if the principles ever go beyond a general philosophy.
“The FCC has said that these are principles and not enforceable doctrine at this point,” said Dan Brenner, senior vice president for law and regulatory policy for the National Cable and Telecommunications Association. “I believe that’s as far as the commission should go.”
A primary concern: these principals could usher in a new era of government activism in the telecom arena. And it’s not just the FCC that worried participants at the PFF forum. Even more trouble may lay up on Capitol Hill, where work has begun on the next major telecom reform bill.
According to several speakers, preliminary staff drafts indicate that Congress is considering adding requirements that would require carriers, under certain conditions, to develop and deploy a set-top box so that televisions could access the Internet. One draft bill also contains a section entitled “build-out requirements,” although those requirements are not yet specified in the bill. Oher lawmakers think that some telecom bills may be splintered or delayed by Congress’ need to respond to the wrath of Hurricane Katrina, pushing any wide-reaching reform out a year or more.
Instead of government mandates, forum participants generally advocated a combination of voluntary enforcement and consumer choice to drive the future of broadband. The FCC’s role should be largely reactive, limited to investigating complaints that are filed, most said.
Not everyone agreed with that viewpoint. Notably, Gigi Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, an advocacy group for technology consumers, backed a moderate level of regulation. She asserted that trouble could ensue if the government is either too aggressive or too lax in promulgating and enforcing standards.
“It doesn’t have to be one way or the other,” Sohn said. “There can be a light regulatory touch.”
Hot Handset Sales To Cool In 2008: Study |
While mobile phones sales have been surging of late, they will start to cool in 2008 because of increasingly saturated markets, according to a study by Informa Telecoms & Media released Wednesday.
OpenOffice.org 2.0 Closes On Final
OpenOffice.org 2.0, the free, open-source rival of Microsoft Office, came another step closer to final Thursday as Release Candidate 1 of the code was offered up to users and testers.
RIAA Sues Another 750 For File Sharing
Even as some file-sharing networks wave the white flag, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) kept up the pressure Thursday by filing another 757 lawsuits against people accused of illegally copying digital music.
U.S. Insists On Keeping Control Of Web
Some countries have been pushing for the United Nations to take a bigger oversight role, but a U.S. government official calls that notion "unacceptable." The question now: how can developing nations get their share of the Internet?
Yahoo Accused Of Stealing Trade Secrets
Voice-recognition firm seeks to stop 13 former engineers now working at Yahoo from involvement with related technology.
Some Voluntary Collection Of Internet Sales Taxes Starts Saturday
An important milestone in the effort to tax Internet retail sales will be reached Saturday when a group of states adopt provisions established by the Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) to collect sales taxes.
Sun StarOffice 8 Makes Its Debut
OpenDocument support may spur interest
Microsoft And JBoss Play Nice
Microsoft’s pact with JBoss is aimed at improving interoperability between the companies’ respective platforms and their competitive posture against a common rival, IBM.
Google's Wireless Plans May Pose Threat To Telecom Companies
Telecom and cable providers are already at battle with a number of government municipalities that are launching free or low-cost Internet services for their communities. Now Google could join the fray with its proposal to provide such services in San Francisco. If chosen as a provider, Google could compete with the city's local telephone and cable companies such as SBC Communications and Comcast.
Yahoo, Others Launch Virtual-Library Alternative To Google Project
Yahoo Inc., the University of California and more than a half dozen other organizations launched on Monday a consortium dedicated to digitizing books and other materials from libraries, archives and publishers, an effort that would compete with a similar, but controversial, initiative by Google Inc.